Codeless test automation involves using tools that require minimal or no coding skills to create automated test scripts. Low-code automation testing consists of some level of coding but with a visual, user-friendly interface.

Adding Lighthouse audits to your automation tests

Sounds controversial? It's not! We can all think of examples of shit code, maybe from code we committed or famous stories from Google, Nasa, Moonpig, etc, etc... etc.

When running automated tests it’s important that that environment is controlled, with no rouge GTM scripts injecting popups, or other domains interfering with the DOM.

Yes, high-quality websites, backed by user behaviour testing and codeless/low code automation, perform better.

Yes, automated testing is worth it when combined with manual (user behaviour) testing and using codeless/low code tools.

Yes, too much domain knowledge can lead to biases and assumptions, potentially missing user behavior nuances.

Enhancing Quality Assurance and Cost-Efficiency at END. Clothing with DoesQA

The primary advantages of all these tools are the same; Speed, Ease and Test Reliability. With intuitive user interfaces, tests can be created and maintained faster and without coding experience.

This video covers the basics of working with slow elements. It shows how to use different Wait For options, including Wait For Enabled, and discusses time-based pauses and why waiting is generally better.

Common terms in automation testing and what they mean.

This video looks at some basic navigation Nodes in DoesQA, including Go To, Back, Forward and Reload.

Retrying failed automated tests can be useful for diagnosing flaky tests, but should not be a method to ignore or dismiss them.

No, using only one testing framework can limit the effectiveness of testing, just like painting a room with only one brush.

The ideal ratio of Quality Engineers to Developers varies based on project complexity and size, but a commonly suggested range is 3-4 developers per Quality Engineer

While developers have valuable skills, they're not necessarily the best testers as their perspective may be biased towards their own code.

No, finding a defect should not stop your testing process; there may be other bugs or issues that need identification and resolution.

Quality Assurance (QA) must always be prioritized; skimping on QA can lead to critical issues post-release that consume more time and resources.

Yes, you should test your application on multiple browsers to ensure consistent user experience across different platforms.

A good level of coverage in software testing typically ranges between 70% to 80%. It varies based on the project's complexity, risk, and specific requirements.

Yes, you can write automated tests even if you're not a Quality Assurance (QA) professional, using codeless and low-code automation tools.

QAs are responsible for identifying and reporting bugs, collaborating with developers to understand the root causes, and ensuring their resolution.

Code produces bugs due to human error, complexity, and changing requirements, leading to logic, syntax, and implementation mistakes.

No, manual testing is not being replaced. It continues to play a vital role in software quality assurance by providing unique insights into user behaviour and ensuring exceptional user experiences.

Yes, Quality Assurance (QA) can save money by identifying and preventing defects early in the software development lifecycle, reducing rework costs and enhancing customer satisfaction.

To test accessibility in test automation, incorporate automated accessibility testing tools, manual testing with assistive technologies, and review accessibility guidelines.

No, Quality Assurance (QA) does not necessarily require coding.

No, record and playback does not create good tests.

Quality Assurance (QA) is the process of ensuring that software meets established standards and expectations. It comprehensively evaluates the software's functionality, performance, usability, and overall quality.

This how-to guide will help fill that gap and turn you from a “manual“ tester to an automation testing machine!

DoesQA, Codeless Test Automation, has saved one of its clients £80,000 (~$100,000) per year!

The integration of AI into software development raises several concerns, including ethical and practical implications.

You’re hired to reduce cockroaches. But your only method introduces more.

This article will provide you with a step-by-step guide on how to compare accessibility scores between websites using DoesQA.

Unlock speed, ease, and reliability with codeless test automation. Say goodbye to time-consuming updates, ambiguity, and high costs.

It is better to wait for an element to appear rather than pausing for a set amount of time for a number of reasons.