While developers have valuable skills, they're not necessarily the best testers as their perspective may be biased towards their own code.

No, finding a defect should not stop your testing process; there may be other bugs or issues that need identification and resolution.

Quality Assurance (QA) must always be prioritized; skimping on QA can lead to critical issues post-release that consume more time and resources.

Yes, you should test your application on multiple browsers to ensure consistent user experience across different platforms.

A good level of coverage in software testing typically ranges between 70% to 80%. It varies based on the project's complexity, risk, and specific requirements.

Yes, you can write automated tests even if you're not a Quality Assurance (QA) professional, using codeless and low-code automation tools.

QAs are responsible for identifying and reporting bugs, collaborating with developers to understand the root causes, and ensuring their resolution.

Code produces bugs due to human error, complexity, and changing requirements, leading to logic, syntax, and implementation mistakes.

No, manual testing is not being replaced. It continues to play a vital role in software quality assurance by providing unique insights into user behaviour and ensuring exceptional user experiences.

Yes, Quality Assurance (QA) can save money by identifying and preventing defects early in the software development lifecycle, reducing rework costs and enhancing customer satisfaction.

To test accessibility in test automation, incorporate automated accessibility testing tools, manual testing with assistive technologies, and review accessibility guidelines.

No, Quality Assurance (QA) does not necessarily require coding.